{"id":"W4236796735","doi":"10.5508/jhs.2015.v15.a11","title":"The Jeroboam Story in the (Re)Formulation of Israelite Identity: Evaluating the Literary-Ideological Purposes of 1 Kings 11–14","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Hebrew Scriptures","topic":"Biblical Studies and Interpretation","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Ideology; Historiography; Reading (process); Empire; Context (archaeology); Literature; Element (criminal law); Secession; Point (geometry); History; Art; Philosophy; Aesthetics; Politics; Archaeology; Political science; Linguistics; Law; Geometry; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003122679,0.0003824476,0.0003406305,0.001199717,0.009329732,0.008083852,0.0008395879,0.002069775,0.002351356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003826417,0.0002070866,0.000107869,0.0009709949,0.02518064,0.003136179,0.003445518,0.003520542,0.0002685333],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008610901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001974538,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01153711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02558958,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984853,0.001033498,0.00002860828,0.00006689341,0.0001989504,0.0001869289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987251,0.0007858113,0.0001416696,0.00007547532,0.0001775281,0.00009440437],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006344359,0.0000413381,0.001206733,0.00005265958,0.000004302343,0.0005126608,0.7781543,0.00005952612,0.0003526391,0.2097092,0.00304699,0.006796175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002407003,0.00007458819,0.004062817,0.0003319753,0.00001276774,0.0004531929,0.8252926,0.0002385427,0.001104089,0.01494354,0.1534407,0.00002112645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6596876,0.004299115,0.001015637,0.009613709,0.0003411417,0.00003129706,0.00003832559,0.00001751432,0.3249556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925339,0.0003426758,0.0001287775,0.0002269767,0.00005168778,0.000009044187,0.00001178983,0.00001279975,0.006682365],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01153711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06247675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07102275227938878,"score_gpt":0.3206374227286962,"score_spread":0.2496146704493074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}