{"id":"W4236856081","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-58-11-2149","title":"Diagnostic tools for unbiased in situ target strength estimation","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Target strength; Statistics; Scale (ratio); Range (aeronautics); In situ; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Environmental science; Index (typography); Mathematics; Fishery; Physics; Biology; Computer science; Materials science; Meteorology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006793541,0.001243099,0.001380641,0.004806994,0.0004226352,0.0015085,0.001869606,0.001731668,0.001661877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09008671,0.0004529514,0.0004514081,0.002059083,0.0007388305,0.002114787,0.001994091,0.001127015,0.0007461787],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005394233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006510455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009799788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006540876,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994852,0.002240277,0.0005749788,0.0005713713,0.001506003,0.0002553002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9610737,0.02672098,0.005610618,0.001785576,0.004442929,0.0003660996],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000501619,0.0002325056,0.06700202,0.0007383742,0.0002489945,0.0008654346,0.0007064159,0.163186,0.0298814,0.06611991,0.006981716,0.6635357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003491581,0.0001547912,0.01061157,0.00008235668,0.00004766535,0.000684641,0.0001930019,0.9306427,0.01704338,0.03670019,0.003677028,0.0001276379],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01238627,0.0001232202,0.9859941,0.00006120669,0.0000260059,0.00005664744,0.0001675737,0.0006266229,0.0005583466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3214869,0.0001925674,0.6759579,0.000122653,0.00009722204,0.0005258624,0.0009100419,0.0001160671,0.0005907071],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006793541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03592813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02018958351813071,"score_gpt":0.2252202217922344,"score_spread":0.2050306382741036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}