{"id":"W4238599545","doi":"10.5194/hessd-10-6669-2013","title":"Socio-hydrology and the science-policy interface: a case study of the Saskatchewan River Basin","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Water resources management and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Global Institute for Water Security; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Water security; Water resources; Context (archaeology); Geography; Population; Corporate governance; Flood myth; Water trading; Climate change; Population growth; Natural resource; Environmental resource management; Environmental planning; Water resource management; Business; Political science; Environmental science; Ecology; Water conservation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001373642,0.0003465206,0.0003414539,0.001327091,0.01121046,0.004199499,0.001453911,0.002012821,0.003874088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002146887,0.0002407579,0.0003270432,0.004377184,0.006008813,0.001523,0.004089942,0.002080698,0.0002057542],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05814474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05262407,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9504527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9844057,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985029,0.0007329406,0.00004293892,0.00007039426,0.0001649219,0.000485897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978493,0.001047615,0.0001184602,0.0001073615,0.0004458412,0.0004313694],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002970164,0.001544116,0.3950568,0.0006872528,0.0003290249,0.06860469,0.1912923,0.03053667,0.005448542,0.1877279,0.03186559,0.08661015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007758169,0.0001448286,0.1563987,0.0004948991,0.00008894734,0.001206274,0.7300356,0.01201839,0.001091428,0.01346089,0.08484329,0.0001391606],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9421221,0.0006278828,0.0006560386,0.007580135,0.00003804607,0.0001734052,0.0003564048,0.00001785689,0.04842802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903977,0.0007694415,0.0007197644,0.0008699409,0.000006016086,0.00007980761,0.0001015101,0.000009881346,0.007046015],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05814474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4218716,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01056796462405077,"score_gpt":0.2282858999524943,"score_spread":0.2177179353284435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}