{"id":"W4238757451","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14665977","title":"A Study On Automatic Software Quality And Reliability Analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Software Reliability and Analysis Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Software quality assurance; Software quality; Software engineering; Reliability (semiconductor); Software; Debugging; Reliability engineering; Quality (philosophy); Static program analysis; Product (mathematics); Software construction; Software quality analyst; Set (abstract data type); Verification and validation; Software metric; Software development; Programming language; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005551252,0.0005141363,0.0006121052,0.002014476,0.0007213778,0.002196649,0.001000331,0.001323483,0.003198861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02813382,0.0004329956,0.0009273589,0.00247958,0.001515348,0.003090482,0.0009132496,0.001616674,0.0005152365],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001376092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001363355,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001499073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006291332,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9908656,0.003804432,0.0003094012,0.001049189,0.003733602,0.0002378115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9559592,0.0350007,0.001901805,0.003265199,0.003688237,0.000184855],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001668823,0.0004020495,0.006670585,0.001015574,0.0001168547,0.0003770415,0.003589508,0.05765487,0.01635708,0.4489668,0.003840242,0.4608425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009929479,0.001636374,0.02259226,0.0009513352,0.0002610288,0.002418439,0.001756215,0.3987035,0.03727219,0.3412672,0.1928502,0.0001919382],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2070804,0.01255642,0.7245177,0.002175169,0.0002796706,0.0002170279,0.0001005833,0.0005299489,0.05254298],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7995659,0.006729312,0.1782371,0.0004906667,0.000354159,0.0002293917,0.0002184727,0.0003945128,0.01378047],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005551252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02935815,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06847448746783201,"score_gpt":0.3818848486556504,"score_spread":0.3134103611878183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}