{"id":"W4238757451","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14665977","title":"A Study On Automatic Software Quality And Reliability Analysis","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Software Reliability and Analysis Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Software quality assurance; Software quality; Software engineering; Reliability (semiconductor); Software; Debugging; Reliability engineering; Quality (philosophy); Static program analysis; Product (mathematics); Software construction; Software quality analyst; Set (abstract data type); Verification and validation; Software metric; Software development; Programming language; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004585597,0.0004460072,0.001438721,0.0006667383,0.0002267145,0.001337979,0.001811477,0.0003094968,0.0001452251],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003518585,0.0003695729,0.0007766697,0.002597181,0.0001306194,0.000228429,0.005372187,0.0011057,0.00002310828],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002101081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000410439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001483162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002302309,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924102,0.002093073,0.001009127,0.002439552,0.001593271,0.0004547615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919781,0.002070884,0.0002592105,0.004820713,0.0005699317,0.0003011687],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001216298,0.004689011,0.9161695,0.0007738352,0.004267863,0.0001417156,0.005522924,0.01270241,0.000002809718,0.0006203543,0.0001205062,0.05497692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002611222,0.0001562474,0.9015104,0.00004954046,0.0005705068,0.000001306879,0.0008183218,0.09202459,0.00002621216,0.004022091,0.00001146127,0.0005482576],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6050357,0.00008321649,0.3929092,0.0007693082,0.00008186376,0.0004867377,0.000007100382,0.0004926297,0.0001342451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9379289,0.00003109387,0.06145931,0.0001970317,0.00002541425,0.0001381093,0.0000268288,0.00001163185,0.0001817338],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3328931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06847448746783201,"score_gpt":0.3818848486556504,"score_spread":0.3134103611878183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}