{"id":"W4239403724","doi":"10.22145/flr.28.3.2","title":"The Amicus Curiae and Intervener in the High Court of Australia: A Comparative Analysis","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; High Court; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006209135,0.00005711927,0.000250101,0.000007354751,0.0006646926,0.00004041204,0.0001453879,0.00001703208,0.0002427258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002014807,0.00002788305,0.00009510196,0.0003180554,0.0006842923,0.00004942834,0.00001465729,0.00006588364,0.00001492767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001596948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001765638,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05518136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1164034,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991091,0.0003132096,0.0001994931,0.00008423672,0.0001798634,0.0001140904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999676,0.000146378,0.00005494143,0.00006513416,0.00004014083,0.00001734298],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005447377,0.000023564,0.001601144,0.00002227267,0.0001211337,0.000001369201,0.001004591,0.000002803395,1.845742e-7,0.9928024,0.002357986,0.002057133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009247885,0.00002532631,0.03224479,0.0004229309,0.0002458162,6.931693e-7,0.0005645355,0.000001752522,0.000001174289,0.01391086,0.952406,0.00008364118],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3631477,0.2776912,0.000006842191,0.06900137,0.0001639719,0.001314133,0.0000496778,0.00002311785,0.2886021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9636698,0.03532501,0.00000724277,0.0006130286,0.00004068093,0.00003101848,0.000001703858,5.476478e-7,0.0003109392],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9788915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9511102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0715606218552786,"score_gpt":0.3773252051461163,"score_spread":0.3057645832908377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}