{"id":"W4239403724","doi":"10.22145/flr.28.3.2","title":"The Amicus Curiae and Intervener in the High Court of Australia: A Comparative Analysis","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; High Court; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005914065,0.0001871801,0.0006565436,0.005534986,0.008339523,0.005506051,0.001142932,0.002242671,0.004932164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02384445,0.0003616892,0.0003554598,0.005683589,0.007111789,0.002823132,0.003798429,0.003063155,0.0004390998],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01911047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01381344,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2067765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3148611,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9890477,0.00566751,0.0002579117,0.000358192,0.002306354,0.002362457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990126,0.005410164,0.001339714,0.0002594062,0.002053733,0.0008109973],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002030259,0.0004300556,0.02623616,0.000688862,0.00011451,0.002798012,0.162169,0.000747125,0.0008519592,0.7371319,0.01060499,0.05802441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001007346,0.0007110237,0.5325835,0.002531761,0.0004301493,0.001606727,0.2038475,0.002967482,0.0009196444,0.04970271,0.204448,0.0001507136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7825353,0.01336292,0.0004911181,0.008149682,0.0001023745,0.00009675624,0.00004537387,0.000005817451,0.1952108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859729,0.00359219,0.0001880182,0.001137498,0.00005517329,0.00005140206,0.00002070072,0.000006626907,0.008975523],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2067765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4111459,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0715606218552786,"score_gpt":0.3773252051461163,"score_spread":0.3057645832908377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}