{"id":"W4239665526","doi":"10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30612-0","title":"The 2002 Canadian Contraception Study: Part 2","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada","topic":"Reproductive Health and Contraception","field":"Medicine","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Manitoba; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Gynecology; Reproductive health; Family planning; Family medicine; Population; Research methodology; Environmental health","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002662183,0.001505086,0.001838349,0.003969371,0.004759618,0.00266752,0.003214265,0.002035883,0.01122409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007625196,0.001630149,0.001798686,0.01784584,0.0007085702,0.0010715,0.001619482,0.001542274,0.001509248],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04284617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08315697,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9950257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980364,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967405,0.0003320808,0.0002750073,0.0003258637,0.00135676,0.0009698051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944814,0.0003304046,0.000787868,0.0003395695,0.002981609,0.001079097],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002225324,0.0003770125,0.7096935,0.00174168,0.00102436,0.0005120416,0.002389108,0.0003543835,0.0004139196,0.001952453,0.2580072,0.02130915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003492695,0.00005277397,0.9598092,0.0004227933,0.0002681359,0.0001199991,0.001048362,0.00009964248,0.00008296163,0.0001016984,0.03759008,0.00005503904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3122599,0.02434106,0.0005695896,0.009849066,0.001134594,0.003194884,0.6106194,0.0001425417,0.03788897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6951214,0.02269337,0.00181532,0.009647096,0.0005923843,0.004991986,0.2140428,0.0002457125,0.05084981],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04284617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3108722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01422941631180047,"score_gpt":0.2500511563688678,"score_spread":0.2358217400570673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}