{"id":"W4239692891","doi":"10.1142/s1464333200000461","title":"MANAGING REGIONAL CUMULATIVE EFFECTS OF OIL SANDS DEVELOPMENT IN ALBERTA, CANADA","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Alberta Energy; The King's University","funders":"Egg Farmers of Canada","keywords":"Cumulative effects; Environmental planning; Sustainable development; Public participation; Environmental resource management; Business; Regional development; Regional science; Geography; Environmental science; Political science; Public administration","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002612107,0.0002673917,0.0003737629,0.0001246807,0.000118397,0.0000192552,0.0002510036,0.0000531106,0.0008484132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004541771,0.0002433961,0.0000784553,0.00017331,0.0001867426,0.0003666428,0.0002303456,0.0001912013,0.000009934932],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001729942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006112362,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05672368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02727795,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977009,0.0001002454,0.0007194834,0.0002502219,0.000840657,0.0003884333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991907,0.0001052061,0.0003495196,0.0001500809,0.000001554922,0.0002029414],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002935803,0.002768437,0.2525523,0.0004591304,0.0007253808,0.0005140167,0.003877266,0.006501121,0.003576554,0.001440495,0.002045839,0.7252459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00196999,0.0001921784,0.9489015,0.0001746363,0.00006068907,0.0000224014,0.0004836872,0.0001084925,0.0006033317,0.0005458863,0.04662633,0.0003108538],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9668834,0.00007821427,0.00003155624,0.0007516337,0.00007431036,0.0001789474,0.000004093497,0.000002572895,0.03199533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891651,0.002761327,0.001756686,0.0006984761,0.0000472137,0.00001413729,0.000005913569,0.00001878973,0.00553239],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7249351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9925405,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005910982313127601,"score_gpt":0.2530996601293404,"score_spread":0.2471886778162128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}