{"id":"W4239864224","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.09.004","title":"Water issues in comprehensive municipal planning: a review of the Motala River Basin","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Environmental Management","topic":"Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Australian Research Council; Victoria University; Deakin University; Parks Victoria","keywords":"Wetland; Context (archaeology); Environmental resource management; Resource (disambiguation); Floodplain; Geography; Threatened species; Natural resource; Flood myth; Environmental planning; Ecology; Habitat; Environmental science; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001482973,0.0005917811,0.001356073,0.00351529,0.0004444873,0.001613933,0.0008789695,0.001075661,0.00169536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002887154,0.0003245352,0.0003940462,0.0102655,0.0005711151,0.001500584,0.0007188647,0.0006788245,0.0002410066],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002015922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008250377,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0288366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1154475,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995295,0.0001248134,0.00009016372,0.00004259646,0.000182321,0.00003060924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982719,0.0008309984,0.0002825281,0.00002328397,0.0004927443,0.00009843652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004181812,0.00005182986,0.0009623443,0.02483351,0.0001226881,0.000252703,0.0004131768,0.001091524,0.0003697041,0.003032159,0.06111936,0.9077093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000179972,0.00007663952,0.00721758,0.01831605,0.0003614918,0.0006971706,0.0009323984,0.000243856,0.0002227936,0.001715006,0.9701635,0.00003554995],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004258588,0.9977338,0.00008699873,0.001009119,0.0001253494,0.00000511416,0.00003204566,0.000003486018,0.0005781688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001988877,0.9972399,0.0002314611,0.0002018755,0.0000723518,0.000005387732,0.00003319819,9.005238e-7,0.0002260286],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0288366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05733752,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03155328811514913,"score_gpt":0.2664524112900106,"score_spread":0.2348991231748614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}