{"id":"W4240183479","doi":"10.1115/1.4002510","title":"A Penalty Formulation for Dynamics Analysis of Redundant Mechanical Systems","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Computational and Nonlinear Dynamics","topic":"Dynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems","field":"Engineering","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Gravitational singularity; Redundancy (engineering); Mechanical system; Robustness (evolution); Control theory (sociology); Computer science; Penalty method; Inverse; Inverse dynamics; Control engineering; Mathematical optimization; Mathematics; Engineering; Artificial intelligence; Physics; Classical mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005648815,0.000122136,0.0004917452,0.0002773509,0.00004254317,0.00004451686,0.0001287953,0.0001150031,0.000002606008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005514326,0.0001036491,0.0002530571,0.000257921,0.00001498064,0.0001111901,0.00001594254,0.0002123844,2.299701e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007495618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004880046,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009740515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001819317,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986708,0.00001762059,0.0007926496,0.00009037631,0.0002997513,0.0001288281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986908,0.0002978694,0.0003472302,0.00008084082,0.0004785421,0.000104677],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008289036,0.00005952594,0.0002862015,0.00009875064,0.0009061196,0.000002086892,0.00002369384,0.849735,0.0006518506,0.143678,0.000008915103,0.004466935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061654,0.0001340462,0.001271576,0.00002605365,0.000439119,0.00004175779,0.00003922448,0.9914881,0.000006503942,0.005722504,0.0001083505,0.000106249],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4660935,0.00005506712,0.5329779,0.00007866549,0.0004887111,0.0001073434,0.0001572236,0.00001072008,0.00003088819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776896,0.00001699109,0.02195542,0.000008969386,0.0001633281,0.000002671891,0.0001304358,0.00001710347,0.00001553085],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5115961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4226687,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005952308461992576,"score_gpt":0.2299917904820311,"score_spread":0.2240394820200385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}