{"id":"W4240202930","doi":"10.1142/s146433320200098x","title":"EVALUATION OF CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT IN<i>FRIENDS OF THE WEST COUNTRY ASSOCIATION</i>v.<i>CANADA</i>AND LAND USE PLANNING ALTERNATIVES","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Cumulative effects; Context (archaeology); Appeal; Strategic environmental assessment; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Resource (disambiguation); Sustainability; Public administration; Land-use planning; Impact assessment; Business; Environmental resource management; Land use; Political science; Engineering; Law; Economics; Geography; Civil engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03485933,0.000885723,0.0007826769,0.004894822,0.004597296,0.007665149,0.003212101,0.001595391,0.004371888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05239217,0.0005308272,0.001490358,0.004467945,0.00412833,0.002300187,0.002789097,0.001547941,0.0002106879],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06804901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06964496,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8939313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9550579,"domain_scores_codex":[0.970277,0.008802295,0.0007228961,0.001510678,0.01605401,0.002633199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9363544,0.02997247,0.002682892,0.002706454,0.02621518,0.002068702],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00466315,0.001904451,0.1185075,0.002640858,0.001860498,0.001680712,0.01370539,0.2025761,0.004271034,0.1642962,0.01988434,0.4640096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001863501,0.009376665,0.2892023,0.003479325,0.006667841,0.0007966111,0.05639311,0.3051341,0.02650468,0.06111676,0.2384041,0.001060878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7315618,0.004467407,0.02935046,0.003313433,0.0001535485,0.005256623,0.00233796,0.0003803308,0.2231784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9640581,0.0009886923,0.02378484,0.0003585512,0.00001890844,0.0004355446,0.0005467078,0.00004358036,0.009765049],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1060687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4937324,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01636279260479895,"score_gpt":0.2997637551403337,"score_spread":0.2834009625355348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}