{"id":"W4240202930","doi":"10.1142/s146433320200098x","title":"EVALUATION OF CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT IN<i>FRIENDS OF THE WEST COUNTRY ASSOCIATION</i>v.<i>CANADA</i>AND LAND USE PLANNING ALTERNATIVES","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Cumulative effects; Context (archaeology); Appeal; Strategic environmental assessment; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental planning; Resource (disambiguation); Sustainability; Public administration; Land-use planning; Impact assessment; Business; Environmental resource management; Land use; Political science; Engineering; Law; Economics; Geography; Civil engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001237292,0.0002109373,0.0003472421,0.00009520969,0.0001167572,0.00003221966,0.0002037668,0.00005932964,0.0001823624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004441262,0.0001629066,0.00006989394,0.0001816915,0.0002043277,0.0005395674,0.0003860398,0.0002454176,5.914629e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002304504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003926945,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009899164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003694666,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996512,0.0004062939,0.0006425844,0.0002011011,0.001976328,0.0002616714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984711,0.0002330016,0.001023093,0.0001593685,0.000009960288,0.0001034089],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001055168,0.0004702503,0.9884099,0.00004233661,0.0002789521,0.000009203584,0.000760658,0.003644675,0.001757912,0.0002391489,0.0001557363,0.004220614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001797464,0.0001652344,0.9938933,0.0001253264,0.0002878877,0.000005541138,0.0005435267,0.001685491,0.0002690072,0.0003794027,0.0007028982,0.0001448733],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934065,0.0001673846,0.00003558961,0.0003332332,0.000141227,0.000451352,0.00003614443,0.000001729648,0.005426804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979237,0.0009838367,0.0004904802,0.0002277215,0.00003704837,0.00001298556,0.000002528968,0.00001280418,0.0003088513],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006204498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996694,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01636279260479895,"score_gpt":0.2997637551403337,"score_spread":0.2834009625355348,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}