{"id":"W4240249213","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.9611.2","title":"Revisiting inconsistency in large pharmacogenomic studies","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"Computational Drug Discovery Methods","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Institute for Cancer Research; Hospital for Sick Children; Montreal Clinical Research Institute; Montfort Hospital; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre; University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Cancer Institute; Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project; Cancer Research Society; Terry Fox Research Institute; National Natural Science Foundation of China; Government of Ontario; Canadian Cancer Society Research Institute; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Supercomputer Centre in Guangzhou; Ontario Institute for Cancer Research; Yale University","keywords":"Pharmacogenomics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Concordance; Medicine; Drug; Computational biology; Cancer cell lines; Genomics; Biology; Bioinformatics; Cancer; Pharmacology; Genetics; Gene; Cancer cell; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2535652,0.001643993,0.003410619,0.01847883,0.002027637,0.009587526,0.006330841,0.001935157,0.002939133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5761854,0.001748095,0.005270933,0.01818902,0.004588551,0.006999247,0.009633224,0.004622227,0.0005441767],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003713588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004459427,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00347323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004855433,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7659088,0.1267541,0.03638767,0.02982688,0.03907589,0.002046631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2521495,0.5795643,0.03608088,0.08912095,0.04081424,0.002270159],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.004123543,0.0004769312,0.4776734,0.01917192,0.04542559,0.005804467,0.01817049,0.01251069,0.01976216,0.04970135,0.05100376,0.2961758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008003683,0.0009656131,0.4642832,0.009956514,0.02001177,0.004460434,0.008160371,0.02722023,0.02838284,0.2041443,0.2306765,0.0009378762],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.4565376,0.06991817,0.3715033,0.03602342,0.00529277,0.001726568,0.03846544,0.004085608,0.01644707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8055493,0.007399964,0.1443915,0.01280994,0.002357312,0.001286203,0.02216833,0.003169742,0.0008676979],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7464348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.920487,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2159574702058582,"score_gpt":0.5073580439062149,"score_spread":0.2914005737003567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}