{"id":"W4240306250","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1299772","title":"An Analytical and Empirical Measure of the Degree of Conditional Conservatism","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conservatism; Measure (data warehouse); Degree (music); Econometrics; Psychology; Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science; Political science; Data mining","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006166034,0.0002231481,0.0003934013,0.002029811,0.0005939277,0.001879895,0.0007199929,0.0006497905,0.003466353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04276157,0.0002020233,0.0003417747,0.002325656,0.0031269,0.002742321,0.001689132,0.00115626,0.0002160384],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008328286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008445985,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007207047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008058763,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968854,0.001109384,0.0003025702,0.0006017674,0.0008962603,0.0002046646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9221177,0.04505241,0.01862873,0.009405065,0.00322881,0.001567245],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006627591,0.0003816902,0.410325,0.0002736465,0.0006726467,0.0004792628,0.003805869,0.04119446,0.01414138,0.4441328,0.002674319,0.0812562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004623891,0.0004754534,0.4618066,0.0001060196,0.0001728333,0.001476027,0.00152353,0.09205957,0.007071262,0.4317749,0.003309172,0.0001784798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8956233,0.0002948449,0.07746757,0.000764938,0.00002721914,0.00004077835,0.0004941478,0.0002127954,0.02507443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966139,0.00003245773,0.002898446,0.00003343683,0.00001432186,0.000009322791,0.00008006878,0.000008572748,0.0003094332],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006166034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03260952,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03385898777516678,"score_gpt":0.2492212778276379,"score_spread":0.2153622900524711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}