{"id":"W4240736797","doi":"10.1109/icse.2005.1553554","title":"Using structural context to recommend source code examples","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings. 27th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2005. ICSE 2005.","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Programming language; Source code; Eclipse; Coding (social sciences); Code (set theory); Context (archaeology); Code review; Class (philosophy); Task (project management); Software engineering; Static program analysis; Artificial intelligence; Software development; Software","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006080428,0.0006483244,0.0004624699,0.0008610053,0.0001950509,0.000886738,0.00259804,0.0002228948,0.0006451732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001894421,0.0006880137,0.0001514366,0.0004595959,0.00005632066,0.001240794,0.0006681241,0.0008218491,0.0003506005],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009246258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002023291,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005243395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002994627,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9956228,0.00001615845,0.0006770061,0.00110838,0.001301938,0.001273688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976175,0.0002656929,0.0001902875,0.000489781,0.000722745,0.0007139595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000334633,0.0006195209,0.04582643,0.0004114254,0.0009769264,0.00009726548,0.007617559,0.2563014,0.01086744,0.4196058,0.08300225,0.1743394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008573232,0.0001489219,0.003961127,0.0003579786,0.00001366503,0.0001414475,0.00009644746,0.7195961,0.004301326,0.0001803356,0.2691292,0.00121609],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1442343,0.0001527238,0.8478563,0.002586718,0.001738158,0.0006443309,0.00008398127,0.002051686,0.0006518734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6856919,0.00004077381,0.3106455,0.0007760815,0.0008989882,0.00009066657,0.0000195309,0.0001083458,0.001728178],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5414577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995571,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06840004737661666,"score_gpt":0.3165482477123839,"score_spread":0.2481482003357673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}