{"id":"W4240997645","doi":"10.1897/1551-3793(2005)1[320:somfdm]2.0.co;2","title":"Survey of Methodologies for Developing Media Screening Values for Ecological Risk Assessment","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Risk assessment; Invertebrate; Environmental science; Environmental risk assessment; Ecology; Biology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02080918,0.002141108,0.001565857,0.01231134,0.0007080862,0.003402037,0.002846991,0.0008642795,0.003266417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0418093,0.001025351,0.002505289,0.006902975,0.001244435,0.002966646,0.001651428,0.002216174,0.001616703],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002869508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004597382,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003491368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00299477,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9893696,0.003840814,0.001299027,0.0008604053,0.004450707,0.0001794008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9729041,0.0159669,0.002601787,0.001278839,0.007027287,0.0002210562],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008032104,0.0001162904,0.00284677,0.01288245,0.0003126261,0.0002059651,0.0004449387,0.01000697,0.003332858,0.03531616,0.005994158,0.9284604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105649,0.001121489,0.007581226,0.03218409,0.001396629,0.001847584,0.001400614,0.02431672,0.05093026,0.07150405,0.8069947,0.0006168903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01156118,0.4447741,0.4893127,0.002220937,0.0006281829,0.001723027,0.002216657,0.001167187,0.04639601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06958174,0.3908868,0.5304135,0.0007661878,0.0003957727,0.001961375,0.002223953,0.0003382116,0.003432544],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02080918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1100508,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07324283693310943,"score_gpt":0.3522078347653217,"score_spread":0.2789649978322123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}