{"id":"W4241036705","doi":"10.2307/4127353","title":"The Chinese Human Rights Reader: Documents and Commentary, 1900-2000.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Affairs","topic":"Chinese history and philosophy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Internet privacy; Law; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002319992,0.0005942244,0.0005187648,0.00216874,0.009141065,0.005011309,0.001325563,0.01013422,0.006895183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007506263,0.0003340556,0.000286984,0.005392155,0.007298126,0.003585859,0.002115035,0.00853214,0.0007829059],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01918258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02366931,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2694412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3888414,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998973,0.0002088386,0.00005620112,0.0001216981,0.0004016082,0.0002387226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968752,0.002083936,0.0001824376,0.00009157493,0.0005579659,0.0002088983],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005613334,0.00001492754,0.0007289093,0.0004908426,0.00001187372,0.0006497584,0.05466317,0.0001035588,0.0002571196,0.1065733,0.8230956,0.01335473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001547326,0.00001072724,0.006383465,0.0007822139,0.00002318335,0.00009049086,0.01654927,0.00008679206,0.0003134681,0.004244547,0.9714718,0.00002842993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.02127868,0.08908295,0.0002219829,0.6675786,0.02023789,0.00005872445,0.0007761139,0.0000460329,0.200719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3359449,0.06444017,0.0004104937,0.2408458,0.0187408,0.0002262607,0.0003289221,0.0001078509,0.3389548],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2694412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5357457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01631561165966833,"score_gpt":0.26585600007927,"score_spread":0.2495403884196017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}