{"id":"W4241062583","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.27507","title":"Site-selection bias can drive apparent population declines in long-term studies","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Wildlife Ecology and Conservation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Selection bias; Population; Selection (genetic algorithm); Censoring (clinical trials); Site selection; Population size; Term (time); Abundance (ecology); Mark and recapture; Econometrics; Sampling bias; Statistics; Computer science; Geography; Ecology; Biology; Machine learning; Demography; Sample size determination; Economics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0373652,0.000373338,0.0009153948,0.00103579,0.001081332,0.001448966,0.001386683,0.001398932,0.003435293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1138027,0.0003181196,0.0007776779,0.002043672,0.001684606,0.001883925,0.001111939,0.001495669,0.0005439633],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007221468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005539635,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002481259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006204719,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9871325,0.007984164,0.001031271,0.001948963,0.001610094,0.0002928631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8342949,0.1180464,0.02367864,0.01681136,0.006253032,0.0009156684],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006047209,0.000176927,0.8005581,0.001160074,0.001382066,0.001579461,0.003710747,0.007585417,0.01384093,0.01883116,0.007379406,0.1431909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001426869,0.0006805437,0.827512,0.0005161877,0.001038883,0.002992988,0.001818963,0.04143679,0.01403879,0.08877271,0.02089198,0.000157427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6349429,0.005473978,0.3393702,0.005013412,0.0006110423,0.0002951655,0.001324604,0.0009247968,0.01204384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9636696,0.0006196434,0.03095043,0.001732528,0.0001673496,0.0002045836,0.0005803996,0.0001621909,0.001913272],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9626348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1976084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05108899819354325,"score_gpt":0.3027538943332732,"score_spread":0.25166489613973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}