{"id":"W4241161039","doi":"10.1111/j.0013-0427.2005.00410.x","title":"Consistent Rationalizability","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economica","topic":"Advanced Algebra and Logic","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Università Bocconi","keywords":"Rationalizability; Binary relation; Mathematics; Consistency (knowledge bases); Extension (predicate logic); Completeness (order theory); Preference relation; Element (criminal law); Preference; Relation (database); Mathematical economics; Maximal element; Set (abstract data type); Pure mathematics; Discrete mathematics; Computer science; Statistics; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006884384,0.0007018627,0.0009747461,0.001191544,0.001574476,0.00355106,0.001425971,0.00186361,0.009053998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01670682,0.0006183013,0.002285699,0.0008158008,0.007360827,0.006679904,0.003964395,0.004244381,0.001062182],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002017064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002106155,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00117448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007935654,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9916053,0.002410605,0.000618097,0.002676219,0.001808732,0.0008810582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988267,0.004158283,0.001111194,0.004072711,0.00208612,0.0003047277],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003168972,0.00002934145,0.0002695939,0.00005505769,0.00003453143,0.00009162234,0.0003163762,0.0008667509,0.0016832,0.987367,0.0007796871,0.00847516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005906168,0.00004602243,0.0003054232,0.0000339384,0.00003716032,0.0001287732,0.0001635277,0.003019847,0.002953801,0.9820011,0.01123124,0.00002001822],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08736874,0.0009437781,0.7165293,0.005559534,0.0004517471,0.0007619827,0.0004905225,0.001616928,0.1862774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8845662,0.0004403513,0.09397163,0.001210364,0.0003405458,0.0006757373,0.0004362125,0.0002477205,0.01811123],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009053998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03640854,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01015380130086226,"score_gpt":0.2131362981509792,"score_spread":0.2029824968501169,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}