{"id":"W4241175141","doi":"10.14429/djlit.37.11573","title":"Metamaterials Research: A Scientometric Assessment of Global Publications Output during 2007-16","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Citation impact; Citation; China; Library science; Metamaterial; World class; Web of science; Geography; Mathematics; Political science; Physics; Computer science; Engineering; Optics; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02909536,0.0001516526,0.0005843825,0.1458553,0.0009475843,0.006526391,0.008144996,0.0002655335,0.0008668629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0632099,0.0001079707,0.0002183726,0.1489071,0.00091195,0.01852053,0.002287004,0.0005745942,0.0001489856],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002854057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001321611,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001748116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.215734e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9873117,0.0003534617,0.002589197,0.0002643657,0.008789293,0.0006919866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852946,0.001145291,0.003768236,0.001595403,0.007826623,0.0003698625],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006316623,0.0002426199,0.7403365,0.00004025058,0.00009595734,0.00001233413,0.00006868298,0.00004595634,0.0009424991,0.112321,0.05092568,0.09490532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001075472,0.0004263847,0.8718072,0.00004525133,0.00001165846,0.0001749073,0.0006789346,0.0002979866,0.01093822,0.05671687,0.05766468,0.0001624158],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9499153,0.0004803391,0.01041932,0.01097578,0.0009796995,0.0003363042,0.0001100452,0.00005108886,0.02673209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987619,0.0004896647,0.01114863,0.0000429247,0.0000840322,0.000009426547,0.000004102278,0.00000642555,0.0005957739],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1314707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5649173997868181,"score_gpt":0.5944565569745612,"score_spread":0.02953915718774314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}