{"id":"W4241415242","doi":"10.1111/j.1654-1103.2004.tb02326.x","title":"Advances in spatial, individual‐based modelling of forest dynamics","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vegetation Science","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts","funders":"","keywords":"Propagule; Canopy; Patch dynamics; Spatial ecology; Forest dynamics; Ecology; Tree (set theory); Vegetation (pathology); Common spatial pattern; Computer science; Environmental science; Ecosystem; Mathematics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008088292,0.00005447288,0.00009422968,0.0002501539,0.0000503773,0.00002730239,0.0003618391,0.00001589416,0.0000346225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005819625,0.00004594626,0.00003235807,0.0007439735,0.0003355576,0.001234284,0.00004174032,0.0000750439,0.00001741815],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001636904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007051424,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001621805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007671103,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987715,0.00001251602,0.0003290893,0.00009074621,0.0006572338,0.0001388984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994484,0.00002720664,0.0003611645,0.0000800698,0.00003118286,0.00005197314],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000689587,0.00003824109,0.04589621,0.000009409451,4.257233e-7,0.000002223921,0.0002925088,0.948698,0.0001012098,0.001110353,0.000002428271,0.00384213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001012719,0.0002557821,0.1462843,0.000165122,0.00001264678,0.000005431572,0.00007121819,0.8363117,0.0009638902,0.01457784,0.0002084894,0.0001308957],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8513196,0.00006545435,0.1428249,0.0002197403,0.000109319,0.00006310073,5.096921e-7,0.000002490111,0.00539486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890677,0.0000498324,0.0107873,0.00006545335,0.00001404854,5.846953e-7,4.032369e-7,0.000002702792,0.00001202784],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.137748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1873634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02135567892841053,"score_gpt":0.2741776240444914,"score_spread":0.2528219451160809,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}