{"id":"W4241889296","doi":"10.1002/asi.20888","title":"Conference proceedings as a source of scientific information: A bibliometric analysis","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":157,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific literature; Library science; Natural science; Computer science; Sociology of scientific knowledge; Data science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Social science; Epistemology; Engineering; Philosophy; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["bibliometrics"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high","status":"direct model label, unvalidated"}],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02030293,0.0001063433,0.0004570007,0.3879982,0.001042778,0.001625596,0.00341921,0.00007028617,0.00001220074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03729713,0.00006118925,0.0004377193,0.8834214,0.006742647,0.00787826,0.000707602,0.0002585347,0.00001057392],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001160325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001387902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000264137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":5.160722e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9902678,0.00001416645,0.001268296,0.0001738131,0.007887334,0.0003886229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9630436,0.000609794,0.003511141,0.0003966988,0.03224511,0.0001936573],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007316556,0.00009902123,0.3403982,0.00002902375,0.0002601891,2.841863e-7,0.005985707,0.0001058225,0.003419667,0.007811286,0.02899052,0.6128271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001771479,0.001958616,0.5000706,0.00003059775,0.0002407674,0.0005887469,0.05346389,0.04823322,0.0138195,0.009815167,0.3695249,0.0004824856],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9842134,0.00006186569,0.01176674,0.003056912,0.0001541136,0.0001997077,0.00001095474,0.00001134054,0.0005250382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951681,0.0002244475,0.004161401,0.0003327184,0.00001141745,0.000005184791,4.385744e-7,0.000001623189,0.00009464654],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6123446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994108,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1955078746505247,"score_gpt":0.4623797083122703,"score_spread":0.2668718336617457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}