{"id":"W4241986853","doi":"10.1139/i06-064","title":"Screening for glaucoma in Canada: a systematic review of the literature","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology","topic":"Medical Coding and Health Information","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; MEDLINE; Medicine; Cost effectiveness; Intervention (counseling); Data extraction; Epidemiology; Health economics; Economic evaluation; Family medicine; Evidence-based medicine; Public health; Alternative medicine; Political science; Pathology; Risk analysis (engineering); Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01496236,0.001899259,0.007761054,0.02741841,0.002356511,0.00474886,0.003126703,0.002772976,0.004696515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06922318,0.001243068,0.005232216,0.03457043,0.001759786,0.002519144,0.001994464,0.001731751,0.0003471561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04187984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1854997,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5894414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8169528,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9850248,0.003336276,0.004346309,0.000954081,0.005512448,0.0008260478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.942183,0.02552271,0.01162997,0.0005810502,0.01835304,0.001730186],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002380981,0.0000198743,0.002846082,0.9261312,0.004217342,0.0003047558,0.0003455404,0.0001623459,0.0001547851,0.0003051682,0.006699747,0.05857496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002425379,0.0001046372,0.01288143,0.9302108,0.03006616,0.0004379623,0.0005422392,0.000149012,0.0001272149,0.0002436332,0.02493171,0.00006279712],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009114777,0.9960845,0.0001036745,0.001072394,0.0001499917,0.0003582856,0.0008430523,0.000008406958,0.000468246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01492752,0.9817775,0.00102048,0.00111077,0.00008855673,0.0004856859,0.0004536723,0.000005968462,0.0001297452],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4105586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.825953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2286687199640662,"score_gpt":0.4524628581218285,"score_spread":0.2237941381577622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}