{"id":"W4241986853","doi":"10.1139/i06-064","title":"Screening for glaucoma in Canada: a systematic review of the literature","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology","topic":"Medical Coding and Health Information","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; MEDLINE; Medicine; Cost effectiveness; Intervention (counseling); Data extraction; Epidemiology; Health economics; Economic evaluation; Family medicine; Evidence-based medicine; Public health; Alternative medicine; Political science; Pathology; Risk analysis (engineering); Nursing","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003068802,0.0002094114,0.002819728,0.0003559423,0.0002292332,0.0000040655,0.0006026781,0.0004078447,0.0001595643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003342092,0.0001218272,0.0003471467,0.0005083246,0.0000385636,0.00004664831,0.00001882374,0.001628441,0.000001880075],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001633348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05087136,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5437822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5741515,"domain_scores_codex":[0.994094,0.001539315,0.003507997,0.00009767102,0.0002318936,0.0005291711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937542,0.001365317,0.00374302,0.0003005123,0.000440966,0.0003959666],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001604531,0.000001448163,0.0003369409,0.9878827,0.00002850244,0.0003535291,0.00009158858,1.793199e-7,3.911463e-10,0.00009897265,0.0100022,0.001202298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001399736,0.0000312591,0.0001218196,0.8526075,0.000279171,0.005877341,0.00005483188,0.000002881598,2.212849e-9,0.00002557951,0.1407809,0.00007868619],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002635565,0.9938946,0.00001185957,0.0004436501,0.001394519,0.002567147,0.0002047856,6.796269e-7,0.00145638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0003004805,0.9976565,0.0001382835,0.0007329995,0.000275631,0.0001818836,0.00005898247,0.00002796874,0.0006272356],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1352752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9545093,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2286687199640662,"score_gpt":0.4524628581218285,"score_spread":0.2237941381577622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}