{"id":"W4242109856","doi":"10.3138/cras-s036-01-04","title":"Mass Appeal(s): Representations of Women’s Public Speech in Suffrage Literature","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Review of American Studies","topic":"Rhetoric and Communication Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Suffrage; Appeal; Politics; Conceptualization; Negotiation; Sociology; Public sphere; Gender studies; Political science; Media studies; History; Law; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003285129,0.0001351517,0.0006732325,0.000253044,0.0001502998,0.00002290943,0.0002374563,0.0000121211,0.0001597014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001997723,0.0001127563,0.00009158505,0.0004292396,0.000854606,0.0001082074,0.00004516946,0.0001035876,0.000007766247],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002931382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001553958,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05697129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1707809,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987326,0.0001155692,0.0005425485,0.0001553851,0.000151609,0.0003022359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985831,0.0001194573,0.0003250775,0.0004025777,0.0004895941,0.00008018045],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008748581,0.0001677627,0.02304225,0.007565146,0.0006382521,0.00003990219,0.08936629,0.000002359855,0.000009659516,0.6045312,0.229423,0.04520535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001176092,0.00005392638,0.004148292,0.002044807,0.00002598199,0.000001669287,0.06478895,7.687237e-7,0.000003517521,0.001312527,0.9273332,0.0001687805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05046574,0.7179237,0.000003340761,0.01222816,0.0002132886,0.0005307278,0.0002117846,0.00002800952,0.2183952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8306332,0.1649947,0.0001718156,0.001036179,0.00009953207,0.0001554307,0.00002912949,0.00001200513,0.002867952],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7801675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9493084,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03576378362396688,"score_gpt":0.2924999635652584,"score_spread":0.2567361799412916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}