{"id":"W4242163558","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3930191","title":"Gender and Racial Diversity of Counsel at the Supreme Court of Canada: An Empirical Study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Diversity (politics); Law; Political science; Affirmative action; Gender diversity; Right to counsel; Racial diversity; Ethnic group; Corporate governance; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003756589,0.0002285588,0.000798027,0.003269818,0.02051755,0.005349697,0.003112248,0.002212047,0.006232712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02440029,0.0004609894,0.0004425778,0.005775316,0.005120699,0.001837245,0.00282862,0.003461732,0.0003633647],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05852004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09926584,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9849326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961042,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9920643,0.001110433,0.0001915035,0.0005980608,0.00321527,0.002820558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9778632,0.005314278,0.003943536,0.0004144728,0.006696986,0.005767514],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001815702,0.0005153235,0.8629537,0.00004402616,0.00007953175,0.0005303386,0.1103742,0.0002100312,0.0002481354,0.005778242,0.005614253,0.01347069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000240358,0.00006638942,0.7393827,0.0002594016,0.00007307072,0.0001982502,0.2502826,0.0004975713,0.0001885185,0.0009964223,0.007978204,0.00005267304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9906503,0.000425259,0.00007159542,0.001824922,0.00002376458,0.00003122694,0.0001753625,0.000002416795,0.006795227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971865,0.0002293335,0.00007068777,0.0004722386,0.00001230489,0.00001241291,0.00006548744,0.000005121195,0.001945791],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05852004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4245946,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05340017718392431,"score_gpt":0.3657747972294521,"score_spread":0.3123746200455278,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}