{"id":"W4242265565","doi":"10.3115/1599503.1599558","title":"Automating the analysis of collaborative discourse","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Complement (music); Visualization; Qualitative analysis; Latent semantic analysis; Data visualization; Semantic analysis (machine learning); Quantitative analysis (chemistry); Data science; Scale (ratio); Discourse analysis; Information retrieval; Natural language processing; Qualitative research; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001711908,0.00006649237,0.0001896783,0.0001682072,0.0001047858,0.00001074478,0.0001271642,0.00003450282,0.001158368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001873692,0.00003750175,0.00006939536,0.002152662,0.00007530243,0.00002353338,0.000007699138,0.0001779882,0.00001520817],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008890372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001434027,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006316013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000063548,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984952,0.000971293,0.0001928438,0.0001225165,0.00009733972,0.0001208459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991326,0.0003550926,0.000149984,0.0002532437,0.0000965673,0.00001252658],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000476829,0.0002423318,0.04028714,0.000001923389,0.002449079,0.000003876713,0.0783072,0.0007974473,0.003494426,0.4756184,0.004655436,0.394095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001269697,0.00008348345,0.9889102,0.000003625636,0.0002987789,5.013407e-7,0.008080818,0.001161736,0.0001655012,0.0003194031,0.0007809323,0.00006807798],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7516138,0.00005148155,0.03563142,0.001614594,0.00009582029,0.00006682437,0.000003165006,0.00006825013,0.2108546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9859746,2.360394e-7,0.008783354,0.0004169092,0.00003037187,0.000002809059,0.000004370116,0.000003323929,0.004784096],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9486231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997547,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02973060401633262,"score_gpt":0.4540972550328945,"score_spread":0.4243666510165619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}