{"id":"W4242459076","doi":"10.1093/auk/123.2.438","title":"Are Point Counts of Boreal Songbirds Reliable Proxies for More Intensive Abundance Estimators?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Auk","topic":"Avian ecology and behavior","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton; University of Alberta; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Abundance (ecology); Estimator; Sampling (signal processing); Statistics; Relative species abundance; Count data; Boreal; Relative abundance distribution; Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Poisson distribution; Mathematics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007269602,0.00004802733,0.00007226492,0.000005035015,0.0000668701,0.000003149245,0.0001115086,0.00003305042,0.0002778533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002463721,0.00003190704,0.00002434633,0.00003839814,0.0002943402,0.00004264317,0.00004014183,0.00004263339,0.0001670534],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000298366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000004838,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009639226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007395009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9996629,0.000005326697,0.00007669975,0.00008253555,0.00006228346,0.0001103047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997495,0.00002073147,0.00008049144,0.0001231007,0.00001511095,0.00001099648],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003029425,0.00005583306,0.8727527,0.000009918536,0.000004208499,0.00000372972,0.0002059222,0.0001765132,0.0004584606,0.0002443109,0.1254704,0.0005877122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001078396,0.00003080948,0.9905687,0.000009586941,0.00001559007,0.00000499724,0.0001746913,0.0001634041,0.00293675,0.002398388,0.003536951,0.00005230351],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9947526,0.00002320353,0.0001446958,0.000717135,0.00008107368,0.0001929454,0.00001741186,0.00001813957,0.004052739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947916,0.000001289933,0.001008974,0.0002301858,0.00001691267,0.00002466848,0.000003478292,0.00000619425,0.003916739],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1219335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3042299,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01093684865916384,"score_gpt":0.2470331618302177,"score_spread":0.2360963131710539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}