{"id":"W4242499937","doi":"10.1115/1.1913705","title":"Kinematic, Static, and Dynamic Analysis of a Planar One-Degree-of-Freedom Tensegrity Mechanism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mechanical Design","topic":"Structural Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Tensegrity; Mechanism (biology); Planar; Kinematics; Stiffness; Compliant mechanism; Computer science; Static analysis; Control theory (sociology); Structural engineering; Topology (electrical circuits); Engineering; Finite element method; Classical mechanics; Physics; Control (management); Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001821431,0.000296488,0.0003011049,0.0004916169,0.000218378,0.000334402,0.0005622095,0.0004592026,0.002294177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000376911,0.0001790216,0.0003400873,0.0003073988,0.0005511401,0.000301284,0.0003960132,0.0001992141,0.0002349198],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001195903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002653702,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005843003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002706009,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999237,0.00001144289,0.000003858651,0.00001919913,0.00003148566,0.00001037001],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999916,0.00001838442,0.00003335251,0.00001255153,0.00001336091,0.000006335327],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001402494,0.00004242719,0.001833334,0.000185871,0.00004024971,0.0009074345,0.0002011793,0.7704394,0.09195224,0.08319904,0.000391695,0.05066679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002839153,0.0003619802,0.002421293,0.000021262,0.00002846695,0.0005010581,0.0001066028,0.9759744,0.005509939,0.01142602,0.003584083,0.00003658577],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2414296,0.0005248707,0.7437595,0.0001515818,0.00003360612,0.00009331946,0.00008051594,0.0001886479,0.01373835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745044,0.0003870169,0.02010068,0.00001282551,0.00001462702,0.00006352017,0.00004202818,0.000007441868,0.004867463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002294177,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007674813,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02665030327016335,"score_gpt":0.2367532134660377,"score_spread":0.2101029101958743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}