{"id":"W4242499937","doi":"10.1115/1.1913705","title":"Kinematic, Static, and Dynamic Analysis of a Planar One-Degree-of-Freedom Tensegrity Mechanism","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Mechanical Design","topic":"Structural Analysis and Optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Tensegrity; Mechanism (biology); Planar; Kinematics; Stiffness; Compliant mechanism; Computer science; Static analysis; Control theory (sociology); Structural engineering; Topology (electrical circuits); Engineering; Finite element method; Classical mechanics; Physics; Control (management); Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006027232,0.0001386895,0.0007668458,0.0004309165,0.00002183644,0.00001507464,0.0001651551,0.0000995685,0.000139358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001416498,0.000106482,0.0002433828,0.0005313955,0.00002238103,0.0001393436,0.00001512801,0.0001738603,8.413003e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004694783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001701985,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000009328307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002666758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984001,0.00008683269,0.0008917972,0.0000957045,0.0003873905,0.0001381622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989054,0.0002267382,0.0003994936,0.0001516466,0.0002091344,0.0001075511],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009323542,0.0000728314,0.0000184872,0.00009693753,0.002929533,0.000008247272,0.0001766008,0.8787747,0.1068677,0.003981068,0.00008361132,0.006897036],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004316389,0.0001784195,0.0006930152,0.00005580427,0.002263856,0.00001539201,0.00005629559,0.9837513,0.008317424,0.004122105,0.000004345048,0.000110402],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07359728,0.0002870852,0.9258014,0.0001324795,0.00005620848,0.00007922604,0.0000127048,0.00001305115,0.00002059296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7074258,0.0003303874,0.2921859,0.00001259904,0.00002579098,6.372719e-7,0.000002374218,0.00001044641,0.00000607779],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6338285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4342209,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02665030327016335,"score_gpt":0.2367532134660377,"score_spread":0.2101029101958743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}