{"id":"W4242910594","doi":"10.2136/vzj2004.0909","title":"Numerical Simulation of the Radius of Influence for Landfill Gas Wells","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vadose Zone Journal","topic":"Landfill Environmental Impact Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada; Natural Resources Canada; Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Landfill gas; Leachate; RADIUS; Environmental science; Closure (psychology); Petroleum engineering; Computer simulation; Environmental engineering; Municipal solid waste; Waste management; Engineering; Simulation; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000191888,0.00009623651,0.0001647172,0.00001859108,0.0001353672,0.000007981491,0.0001998415,0.00003667964,0.0002244215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009719894,0.00005792866,0.0001133274,0.0001302057,0.0002003155,0.000169391,0.00009333348,0.0001093653,0.00002136998],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001596379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001148983,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001610264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004610918,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990687,0.00002997872,0.0002977291,0.00009763231,0.0003263975,0.0001796133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994183,0.00007878568,0.0002774727,0.0001499177,0.000008564809,0.00006702475],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005611719,0.0001295991,0.1069868,0.000006848502,0.00002398983,0.000001333684,0.0005654454,0.8665351,0.02376874,0.000005061713,0.0001723453,0.001748625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002869073,0.0004949768,0.8953624,0.00009113835,0.00007473777,0.00009768365,0.00008222541,0.003711629,0.09162109,0.002419174,0.00295425,0.0002215934],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913687,0.00005292784,0.007334493,0.0004461397,0.00009779482,0.0001926073,0.00001027026,0.000004486219,0.0004925887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981885,0.0000408763,0.001532559,0.0001209819,0.00003161568,0.00000233563,4.729722e-7,0.000009255868,0.00007341577],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8628235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2457258,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008920797550306763,"score_gpt":0.2385072759049406,"score_spread":0.2295864783546338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}