{"id":"W4243250765","doi":"10.26434/chemrxiv.5388397","title":"Evaluating Force-Field London Dispersion Coefficients Using the Exchange-Hole Dipole Moment Model","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ChemRxiv","topic":"Chemical Thermodynamics and Molecular Structure","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"London dispersion force; Dipole; Force field (fiction); Dispersion (optics); Chemistry; Cyclohexane; Polarizability; Density functional theory; Thermodynamics; Moment (physics); Vaporization; Computational chemistry; Molecule; Physical chemistry; Physics; Classical mechanics; Organic chemistry; Optics; Quantum mechanics; van der Waals force","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000238844,0.0004663179,0.0004047,0.0000321045,0.0004429428,0.0002218817,0.001159413,0.0005173619,0.0002638116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001295121,0.0003630063,0.0003859968,0.00003819525,0.0001091073,0.00003286775,0.002066369,0.001024609,0.00000578277],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002847788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001221017,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007079734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000003045991,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978237,0.00001765291,0.0003270431,0.0007750271,0.0005852961,0.0004713491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974443,0.00004633682,0.0004343719,0.001822095,0.0001165376,0.0001364167],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004539462,0.00005316513,0.00002790248,0.0005112044,0.0001015025,0.000007945213,0.0002691353,0.05982229,0.9318582,0.00006957783,0.0001839297,0.007049726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000343346,0.00000621554,0.000001434331,0.0003557889,0.0001195337,0.000003279745,0.00002960815,0.6652215,0.3310769,0.002123089,0.0003919471,0.0003274294],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9723654,0.001289454,0.01715517,0.0002399291,0.0003327634,0.0002623289,0.00003017032,0.00006477987,0.008259994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953442,0.000134129,0.0009626704,0.0001451377,0.0003254492,0.0000487647,0.000154955,0.00009011494,0.002794588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6053992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998822,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05036905544980477,"score_gpt":0.3361601110983151,"score_spread":0.2857910556485103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}