{"id":"W4243377541","doi":"10.1109/icse.2000.870494","title":"Empirical investigation of a novel approach to check the integrity of software engineering measuring processes","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2000 the New Millennium","topic":"Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Benford's law; Computer science; Cyclomatic complexity; Software quality; Java; Software metric; Context (archaeology); Software engineering; Software; Source lines of code; Data mining; Software development; Programming language; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05560524,0.0005850075,0.0006573597,0.005888059,0.001415405,0.003580161,0.002560905,0.002327028,0.001513729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3453453,0.0004303437,0.0006702665,0.006506242,0.006441101,0.009523816,0.003081412,0.003045408,0.0003388473],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001859096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001962204,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001599765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001573831,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9251594,0.04788369,0.004407204,0.005261817,0.01653344,0.000754421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4483123,0.4180433,0.06958482,0.04024728,0.0222117,0.001600541],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006154482,0.001792708,0.700992,0.0005777444,0.0005052448,0.0007247541,0.0118539,0.01041281,0.00334983,0.09232488,0.002084158,0.1747665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006398121,0.005165645,0.3103881,0.0006556607,0.0003468491,0.006220608,0.01347917,0.4722868,0.01548579,0.1489298,0.0260746,0.0003272194],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7866414,0.0007009364,0.2008182,0.002668126,0.00008611767,0.000487073,0.000371092,0.0001615016,0.008065684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9466144,0.0001625787,0.05218999,0.0002158998,0.00006926245,0.000250206,0.0001787266,0.00001664486,0.0003022499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9443948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2940721,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1084400365691253,"score_gpt":0.2724777831869659,"score_spread":0.1640377466178407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}