{"id":"W4243377541","doi":"10.1109/icse.2000.870494","title":"Empirical investigation of a novel approach to check the integrity of software engineering measuring processes","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2000 the New Millennium","topic":"Benford’s Law and Fraud Detection","field":"Mathematics","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Benford's law; Computer science; Cyclomatic complexity; Software quality; Java; Software metric; Context (archaeology); Software engineering; Software; Source lines of code; Data mining; Software development; Programming language; Statistics; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005214847,0.0003452229,0.0004054265,0.0002061196,0.0000873293,0.00005739894,0.001285573,0.0001826684,0.00005238848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004251444,0.0002148088,0.0001884685,0.0006950672,0.0001107905,0.0002193242,0.0002080029,0.0006398855,0.000003642452],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001855903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001680225,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005826711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004218782,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977515,0.00001008494,0.0007045455,0.0003266659,0.0009161857,0.0002910318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977515,0.00031802,0.0004470767,0.0003075407,0.001067547,0.0001082946],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002091998,0.006219766,0.06980994,0.01916505,0.00501356,0.000002564393,0.1682113,0.134901,0.1811455,0.2807147,0.1188655,0.013859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005876819,0.001359311,0.03768635,0.009527456,0.0009208175,0.0002674806,0.002969035,0.3557602,0.5504453,0.0101466,0.02145812,0.003582494],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8490195,0.0005435413,0.1413047,0.002778858,0.001294096,0.001979355,0.0001578432,0.0004868594,0.002435229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9583921,0.00006620449,0.04035554,0.0000973952,0.0002260767,0.00007642538,0.000002686003,0.00005883004,0.000724747],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3692998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8759647,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1084400365691253,"score_gpt":0.2724777831869659,"score_spread":0.1640377466178407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}