{"id":"W4243442421","doi":"10.21203/rs.2.12336/v1","title":"Trends analysis of cancer topic of Cochrane systematic reviews: a bibliometric analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square (Research Square)","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; Meta-analysis; Medicine; MEDLINE; Political science; Internal medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04353112,0.001859816,0.009645073,0.2177035,0.001592622,0.006696799,0.00198426,0.001392978,0.004445485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2550659,0.001167658,0.01530178,0.2519234,0.001087278,0.006660481,0.005290437,0.001224255,0.0007573344],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00606728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01414695,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007646717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008827828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9155568,0.02147622,0.03066892,0.006381456,0.02430385,0.00161278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7525412,0.1588819,0.05137395,0.006504513,0.02915483,0.00154363],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001526893,0.0001888315,0.3447103,0.342634,0.04344851,0.0007942933,0.004939908,0.004951796,0.001505269,0.005559697,0.01856769,0.2311729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009715246,0.0013839,0.598818,0.1326517,0.1004654,0.003939327,0.01391297,0.02593632,0.003543235,0.01457902,0.103046,0.0007525511],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3015447,0.4788831,0.02023163,0.006706666,0.0006902399,0.01319977,0.163803,0.0015577,0.01338325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7320927,0.150339,0.04842534,0.0006916532,0.0004928436,0.02556961,0.04009954,0.0004730693,0.001816243],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9564689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2302173,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.8344158763223873,"score_gpt":0.6738936638103186,"score_spread":0.1605222125120688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}