{"id":"W4243504784","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-30-1-178","title":"Erratum: Loblolly pine growth response to herbaceous vegetation control at different planting densities","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"erratum","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Loblolly pine; Herbaceous plant; Sowing; Forestry; Vegetation (pathology); Environmental science; Pinus <genus>; Agronomy; Biology; Agroforestry; Geography; Botany","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001828791,0.002055995,0.001800017,0.00262092,0.003504972,0.001967201,0.002583353,0.005923548,0.06832036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02344308,0.001328706,0.001122672,0.001998691,0.0009723966,0.001895943,0.00097831,0.005031829,0.03787392],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002965397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003718148,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04863998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06030063,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985713,0.0001258271,0.0003615369,0.0001738013,0.0006344687,0.0001330313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747977,0.004238907,0.001371233,0.001560541,0.01705864,0.0009729535],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008743934,0.0000311198,0.0002889049,0.0001178711,0.000007859985,0.0001807185,0.00002042164,0.00008305121,0.0001341414,0.0001936867,0.9932255,0.005629289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001536977,0.0002154197,0.01468521,0.000606881,0.0001051702,0.0005334488,0.0003182312,0.0008781071,0.002237691,0.0009675972,0.9791661,0.0001324847],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.001193837,0.0008638534,0.0006652247,0.035521,0.9472933,0.00006519778,0.004255579,0.0006390531,0.009502982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03098254,0.005591672,0.007779469,0.08598762,0.161962,0.0003889102,0.01351762,0.002469275,0.6913208],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06832036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2285544,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01504908303446151,"score_gpt":0.2526838002648248,"score_spread":0.2376347172303633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}