{"id":"W4244032408","doi":"10.1139/cgj-37-6-1195","title":"Risk-based liquefaction potential evaluation using standard penetration tests","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liquefaction; Geotechnical engineering; Penetration test; Standard penetration test; Soil liquefaction; Penetration (warfare); Forensic engineering; Geology; Environmental science; Engineering; Operations research","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001803775,0.0009580184,0.0005645313,0.002615654,0.0003482425,0.0007651242,0.0007890711,0.0007360753,0.002017627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005259066,0.0002638162,0.0006357773,0.001315454,0.0003792146,0.001325399,0.0006628639,0.0003281319,0.0002785297],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008081467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005696912,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00493691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005629465,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987487,0.0003057742,0.00008592688,0.0001012342,0.0006678919,0.00009047404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964219,0.001744008,0.0003243194,0.0002290012,0.001207117,0.0000737318],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001816739,0.0004753962,0.03870105,0.0002921686,0.0001809383,0.000557057,0.0001808323,0.7934426,0.0498266,0.002740592,0.0007023403,0.1110837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005418982,0.001571517,0.0219265,0.00002589124,0.0001128934,0.0002820199,0.0001396111,0.9278505,0.04579614,0.001678745,0.0004954841,0.00006659413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9178064,0.0001854937,0.07636646,0.00002685041,0.000008176753,0.0001077002,0.0003893689,0.0002790503,0.004830433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911465,0.00008218701,0.007546844,0.000005240264,0.000001527869,0.00002726721,0.0002165926,0.00001831916,0.000955471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00493691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009816349,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009588342811858976,"score_gpt":0.2271188888287874,"score_spread":0.2175305460169284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}