{"id":"W4244187362","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14651844","title":"The effect of face-to-face communication on editorial stance: a case study of the 2010 Liberal Express tour","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Media Studies and Communication","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rhetoric; Face-to-face; Face (sociological concept); Newspaper; Power (physics); Politics; Media studies; Political science; Face value; Sociology; Public relations; Law; History; Social science; Epistemology; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006869878,0.0005210579,0.0003947402,0.001934025,0.01573526,0.006949374,0.001414526,0.003103105,0.003844616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03176295,0.0004521688,0.0003130426,0.001934868,0.005375573,0.002861292,0.003333293,0.002665636,0.0007211249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005240914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003700705,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02450721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07578285,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9905679,0.006759399,0.0001913441,0.0004442872,0.001136036,0.0009010938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9311381,0.05721429,0.004683619,0.001547074,0.002803414,0.002613486],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003226519,0.0008284178,0.01884882,0.000316455,0.00002375575,0.01475701,0.9337147,0.0001866593,0.003922188,0.002084988,0.00370369,0.02129057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005575546,0.0003710094,0.02559755,0.0001516446,0.00002942739,0.002298565,0.9400113,0.0004483631,0.002274165,0.0005712153,0.02813233,0.00005867255],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823148,0.00016747,0.0003004301,0.001525193,0.00006500485,0.00006679551,0.00004755167,0.00001541923,0.01549725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992043,0.0002463085,0.0008606241,0.0005874266,0.00009816752,0.0000882379,0.00004817842,0.00003474568,0.0059933],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02450721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04872912,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02793644432347159,"score_gpt":0.3445029096312646,"score_spread":0.316566465307793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}