{"id":"W4244203597","doi":"10.1515/iupac.86.0002","title":"Defining the Transfer Coefficient in Electrochemistry: An Assessment","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"IUPAC Standards Online","topic":"Electrochemical Analysis and Applications","field":"Chemistry","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Electrode; Electron transfer; Charge transfer coefficient; Electrochemistry; Chemistry; Anode; Sign (mathematics); Reaction rate constant; Kinetic energy; Transfer (computing); Electron; Standard electrode potential; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Thermodynamics; Atomic physics; Kinetics; Physical chemistry; Physics; Quantum mechanics; Mathematics; Organic chemistry; Cyclic voltammetry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01258554,0.003461628,0.002001743,0.005072336,0.001543956,0.005810848,0.005941266,0.004055435,0.003019851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02131128,0.001271192,0.001287014,0.005792294,0.009335635,0.01646882,0.006183193,0.01019052,0.002729842],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003065314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001998902,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001485751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004990239,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9910062,0.00293645,0.0005522571,0.001399939,0.003820953,0.0002841847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905831,0.005930282,0.0005323293,0.001062018,0.001736631,0.0001556754],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003648085,0.00007804172,0.0004181563,0.001426237,0.00003647654,0.0001645108,0.0004886221,0.003978568,0.003189401,0.9342422,0.004900936,0.05104028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001544724,0.0002525315,0.0008785622,0.0009421265,0.00005015744,0.001150583,0.0003858711,0.02436988,0.00797398,0.7911097,0.1726676,0.0002034907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"dataset","genre_scores_codex":[0.01032938,0.2561856,0.6362672,0.006609894,0.004333518,0.0002372604,0.0001897811,0.0003331617,0.08551425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2710532,0.3144193,0.3586121,0.005545644,0.01299351,0.00116535,0.0005047183,0.001204136,0.03450194],"genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01258554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06655949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006977027269491015,"score_gpt":0.3869762000792802,"score_spread":0.3799991728097892,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}