{"id":"W4244422633","doi":"10.30707/lib3.1safi","title":"Quantifying Distribution in Carbon Uptake and Environmental Measurements with the Gini Coefficient","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Letters in Biomathematics","topic":"Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Biological and Environmental Research; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences; Natural Resources Canada; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Gini coefficient; Environmental science; Carbon fibers; Distribution (mathematics); Flux (metallurgy); Ecosystem; Precipitation; Atmospheric sciences; Population; Coefficient of variation; Consistency (knowledge bases); Statistics; Mathematics; Ecology; Geography; Chemistry; Biology; Demography; Physics; Meteorology; Inequality","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005862089,0.0005822273,0.000737778,0.005093677,0.0005155349,0.002105232,0.0007356906,0.0007121365,0.00133855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03010972,0.0003014423,0.0007899247,0.007517643,0.001139632,0.002653867,0.001570233,0.001229691,0.0004425455],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001626884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005271846,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004978924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003112209,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996502,0.00116868,0.0002545919,0.001025609,0.0008713559,0.0001778023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869102,0.008700136,0.001844326,0.001439142,0.0009325141,0.0001736903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002805408,0.00008617657,0.5776217,0.0002556375,0.001215196,0.0004657109,0.001458391,0.1528833,0.006408476,0.09055588,0.009455398,0.1593135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002345468,0.00009163045,0.3104652,0.00009923349,0.0001445668,0.0008495228,0.0007725464,0.4830899,0.006758336,0.1704284,0.02711677,0.0001604476],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4302391,0.001727762,0.5416179,0.000652193,0.0001713239,0.0001580146,0.005911877,0.0008468668,0.01867503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9315856,0.000373997,0.06389313,0.00008282753,0.00005558932,0.0001323302,0.002692491,0.0002377081,0.0009461236],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005862089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03100204,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01802460472207413,"score_gpt":0.2072409276245417,"score_spread":0.1892163229024676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}