{"id":"W4244505518","doi":"10.1080/713659836","title":"The Pragmatics of Empirical AdequacyThanks are due to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, and to the University of Melbourne for support of this research. This paper has benefited from discussion with members of the Philosophy and History and Philosophy of Science departments at the University of Melbourne and the Philosophy department at La Trobe University, as well as from the comments and suggestions of three anonymous referees.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australasian Journal of Philosophy","topic":"Philosophy and History of Science","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Empirical research; Context (archaeology); Empiricism; Isomorphism (crystallography); Sociology; Pragmatics; Philosophy; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003667705,0.0002243657,0.0005749435,0.0001797187,0.003548834,0.00003718968,0.001170281,0.00007648717,0.0000711942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002192096,0.0001024637,0.0001137031,0.0003313823,0.0315512,0.0003484932,0.0007834579,0.0004088133,1.774718e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004164155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001443122,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01713972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09979329,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962553,0.0006031857,0.0005169303,0.0003207808,0.002005948,0.0002978473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957469,0.001327397,0.001066538,0.0004166409,0.001300757,0.0001417984],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009972862,0.00085843,0.01258905,0.0006425789,0.001267903,0.00003827631,0.4078508,0.0002221881,0.002090345,0.5497413,0.01431573,0.0004104495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01432837,0.009000324,0.09546501,0.003048097,0.00209674,0.0001524162,0.1307427,0.00007682609,0.002778147,0.6587541,0.08270168,0.0008556202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9174114,0.001214557,0.000002868449,0.0722485,0.00007040609,0.0007995684,0.0008496727,0.000002078988,0.007400932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991939,0.0003161034,0.00007454465,0.0001392512,0.00006689117,9.555627e-7,0.000002267647,0.00001011894,0.0001959588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2771082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977484,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1480171286582085,"score_gpt":0.2848883877462954,"score_spread":0.1368712590880869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}