{"id":"W4244949983","doi":"10.1109/icse.2000.870428","title":"A replicated assessment and comparison of common software cost modeling techniques","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the 2000 International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2000 the New Millennium","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Reputation; Software quality; Software; Quality (philosophy); Risk analysis (engineering); Software quality control; Software metric; Order (exchange); Product (mathematics); Software quality analyst; Software sizing; Reliability engineering; Software development; Software construction; Business; Engineering; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03139191,0.001853807,0.001231043,0.01083508,0.00097508,0.003439097,0.002992498,0.001928957,0.001830186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.100325,0.0006162188,0.003052225,0.007554781,0.0008546925,0.005081871,0.002459105,0.00170822,0.0005080799],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003858401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002190439,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00641533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005845805,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9727697,0.01311611,0.001854334,0.001387527,0.01032893,0.0005432725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9078258,0.06021498,0.005141978,0.009200277,0.01716892,0.0004481029],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00126254,0.001138443,0.02256552,0.001299987,0.0008236883,0.0001066236,0.001207084,0.2355738,0.004424768,0.03174136,0.002684508,0.6971716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000146676,0.002184802,0.03173032,0.0005325869,0.0005690617,0.0002820947,0.0009953559,0.9274153,0.006775873,0.01970604,0.00943227,0.0002295766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4376565,0.007599284,0.5280461,0.001099016,0.000242139,0.00101582,0.001141081,0.00140835,0.02179179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6559332,0.003094549,0.3374298,0.00007558071,0.00006883264,0.0005666256,0.001113051,0.000253613,0.001464788],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9686081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1660182,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04642133386724595,"score_gpt":0.3099693863626654,"score_spread":0.2635480524954194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}