{"id":"W4245379082","doi":"10.1139/x99-169","title":"Some observations on fitting assumed diameter distributions to horizontal point sampling data","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Statistics; Sampling (signal processing); Point (geometry); Sample (material); Point estimation; Distribution (mathematics); Population; Representation (politics); Sample size determination; Point process; Statistical physics; Geometry; Mathematical analysis; Computer science; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04557287,0.001026072,0.0009962327,0.0013716,0.001428693,0.002846626,0.003826399,0.003367376,0.002550669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3414884,0.001234099,0.00141457,0.002629093,0.003931028,0.004946664,0.002219594,0.004560205,0.001046887],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002690813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009576132,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01558961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008265338,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9799628,0.0106724,0.001690715,0.002491092,0.004498365,0.0006845334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7118443,0.2520596,0.009143625,0.01723731,0.00926656,0.0004485156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005326803,0.0001581081,0.07099932,0.001637348,0.000435688,0.0007858477,0.00618261,0.5521988,0.004654822,0.1269097,0.005108837,0.2303963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001027999,0.0006240528,0.060346,0.001221282,0.000204146,0.003543834,0.003764696,0.577718,0.01845199,0.2984129,0.034976,0.0006343129],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0932882,0.001131638,0.8976942,0.001691058,0.0001631621,0.0001018205,0.0003244568,0.0006162281,0.004989223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7329803,0.002355189,0.2578526,0.001586973,0.0002746102,0.0003118931,0.001173339,0.0007986788,0.002666308],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04557287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2410152,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.127539936273567,"score_gpt":0.3395599675054309,"score_spread":0.2120200312318639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}