{"id":"W4245416002","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.832","title":"Assessing the reproducibility of discriminant function analyses","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Genome British Columbia; Université de Montréal; B.C. Women's Hospital & Health Centre; Women's Health Research Institute; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Discriminant function analysis; Function (biology); Statistics; Variance (accounting); Field (mathematics); Metadata; Data mining; Discriminant; Data science; Information retrieval; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Mathematics; Biology; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.214953,0.002000602,0.002281688,0.01494296,0.002376552,0.00661118,0.002938185,0.002417659,0.003294617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5177867,0.0008203643,0.004982059,0.01160923,0.0046585,0.003646856,0.005417162,0.002183622,0.002444249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001536774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002026925,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001375608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001460682,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8328825,0.07314419,0.03352715,0.02553562,0.03272026,0.002190242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3585991,0.4563418,0.03528474,0.08976887,0.05819974,0.001805652],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002932595,0.0005031154,0.5273223,0.01048084,0.01106656,0.001700349,0.01159193,0.02793697,0.01685705,0.01486296,0.02208741,0.352658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006994705,0.002121358,0.5350429,0.003795031,0.006936795,0.004461085,0.008705329,0.1141675,0.0670177,0.0934989,0.1622068,0.0013472],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4834495,0.01330685,0.4599315,0.002095034,0.002223924,0.001837119,0.01570327,0.004875956,0.0165768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8584976,0.001215962,0.122566,0.0006199045,0.0004480696,0.002324353,0.01079235,0.001622769,0.001912944],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7850471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9681028,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1357817595460411,"score_gpt":0.4065993027196365,"score_spread":0.2708175431735954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}