{"id":"W4245902688","doi":"10.32920/ryerson.14660817","title":"Environmental Load Evaluation of Nipigon River Bridge","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Retrofitting; Bridge (graph theory); Environmental science; Current (fluid); Scope (computer science); Climate change; Moment (physics); Wind engineering; Civil engineering; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Engineering; Structural engineering; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001469046,0.000157156,0.0002153973,0.00006871154,0.000009770479,0.0000190536,0.00008981022,0.0001394936,0.00169006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001265359,0.0001627021,0.000144767,0.00006088501,0.00002345559,0.00004606633,0.00007497073,0.0001756387,0.00001439604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002746157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003792334,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00007666125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001134043,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990035,0.00002411057,0.0002263081,0.0001687628,0.0004887657,0.00008860681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999594,0.00001004014,0.00003475203,0.0002798462,0.00004488747,0.00003645322],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[5.353633e-7,0.000004704214,0.00007793647,0.00006113918,0.000167293,4.458925e-7,0.000227867,0.9720023,0.005369896,0.000009365923,0.0001928536,0.02188564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001591003,0.000002794378,0.03395882,0.00002982219,0.0002252847,0.000001358217,0.0000625317,0.9426673,0.02257896,0.00004912872,0.0000796115,0.0001852793],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9406136,0.001128036,0.05469059,0.000008623434,0.0005088492,0.0001152036,0.00003440555,0.0001469955,0.002753674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983388,0.0001414993,0.001136839,0.000006075262,0.00004976127,0.00001200273,0.0002252203,0.00002004584,0.00006982425],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05772511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02094722181149059,"score_gpt":0.2369612063952125,"score_spread":0.2160139845837219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}