{"id":"W4245985127","doi":"10.1680/stbu.2006.159.3.179","title":"Discussion: Cracking analysis of fibre-reinforced polymer-reinforced concrete tension members","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings","topic":"Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Stiffening; Serviceability (structure); Cracking; Materials science; Stiffness; Tension (geology); Shrinkage; Composite material; Structural engineering; Fibre-reinforced plastic; Reinforced concrete; Deformation (meteorology); Ultimate tensile strength; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001190984,0.0002934985,0.000380848,0.000810002,0.00092653,0.0008652951,0.001028709,0.002108576,0.01367955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004901971,0.0001787286,0.0008270702,0.0003734911,0.0004033493,0.00185689,0.0003790167,0.001054737,0.002268923],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004532685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003924851,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004742275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00254015,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993298,0.0001070792,0.00004595739,0.0001025357,0.0003668579,0.00004786858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968166,0.00127985,0.0001227548,0.0001531598,0.001536277,0.00009146324],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001044925,0.0005566453,0.02688732,0.001500858,0.0001491865,0.002690003,0.001862443,0.1742807,0.2443708,0.05162649,0.1977088,0.2973218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008826658,0.0006159554,0.03892427,0.0002231844,0.000107945,0.001660701,0.0009845259,0.3856859,0.3356941,0.03236998,0.2033502,0.0002949194],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4474589,0.006515603,0.4051114,0.07256261,0.01403283,0.0003848264,0.003273532,0.002293793,0.04836656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7195868,0.004939538,0.05973917,0.006510013,0.005939275,0.0001715738,0.00150513,0.001338091,0.2002704],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01367955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04576272,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005216013219906312,"score_gpt":0.2015995962046923,"score_spread":0.196383582984786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}