{"id":"W4246192781","doi":"10.1120/1.1580189","title":"Electron energy constancy verification using a double-wedge phantom","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","topic":"Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"BC Cancer Agency","funders":"","keywords":"Imaging phantom; Wedge (geometry); Reproducibility; Optics; Electron; Physics; Energy (signal processing); Range (aeronautics); Cathode ray; Diode; Computational physics; Materials science; Nuclear medicine; Mathematics; Nuclear physics; Optoelectronics; Statistics; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002321993,0.0002049753,0.0006303249,0.00005184438,0.0001025519,0.0000517824,0.0004467829,0.0002714372,0.0003339147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002302128,0.000165648,0.0002248917,0.0002777211,0.0003383406,0.0001594418,0.00003059028,0.0007398337,0.00002357245],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001308216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008708744,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005343269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002124505,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9967757,0.0001655635,0.001324444,0.0002945241,0.0009825681,0.0004571438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979053,0.0003398815,0.0008611137,0.0002802982,0.0001920555,0.0004213422],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007459473,0.0008530265,0.00007556304,0.00001659864,0.00004723608,0.00002268477,0.00004300402,0.000008351707,0.5668571,0.4228428,0.001780979,0.006706754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002213205,0.000510735,0.00001727476,0.00006865142,0.00007801772,0.00004437918,0.00001930401,0.0001173564,0.9136016,0.07224052,0.01086623,0.000222718],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6992123,0.0005461429,0.2803966,0.0003768723,0.001266381,0.0002446978,0.000002588652,0.0001322944,0.01782222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882676,0.0004690508,0.009178119,0.000977887,0.001046533,0.00000622716,0.000001615066,0.00002972178,0.00002325595],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3506022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.675493,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04223811988574198,"score_gpt":0.3725661336633709,"score_spread":0.3303280137776289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}