{"id":"W4246192781","doi":"10.1120/1.1580189","title":"Electron energy constancy verification using a double-wedge phantom","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","topic":"Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"BC Cancer Agency","funders":"","keywords":"Imaging phantom; Wedge (geometry); Reproducibility; Optics; Electron; Physics; Energy (signal processing); Range (aeronautics); Cathode ray; Diode; Computational physics; Materials science; Nuclear medicine; Mathematics; Nuclear physics; Optoelectronics; Statistics; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00191461,0.0007849651,0.0006194675,0.0010061,0.0003671114,0.0008379343,0.0009137057,0.0009665148,0.003697424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004378597,0.0006573704,0.0003196824,0.0007670274,0.000606933,0.001148257,0.001622154,0.0009057201,0.0007806374],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004503641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006283425,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003892621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005657773,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991917,0.0001182496,0.00007340476,0.0002780107,0.0002809037,0.0000578548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964149,0.001261137,0.0005961556,0.0009421282,0.0006319169,0.000153714],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008854184,0.00006839167,0.002094649,0.0001859332,0.00001982397,0.000411217,0.0001655199,0.001819162,0.9556749,0.00174194,0.000513054,0.03642003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007765758,0.0007182244,0.008555881,0.00004077945,0.00004958145,0.003746272,0.00006369761,0.01622712,0.9607447,0.0007746833,0.008914165,0.00008721889],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2267839,0.001255697,0.7617791,0.0002864579,0.0002140912,0.0004504284,0.0006407613,0.003539759,0.005049956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4915819,0.0004349523,0.5021249,0.0001674832,0.00002750682,0.0002631913,0.00043852,0.0006289674,0.004332576],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003697424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0123691,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04223811988574198,"score_gpt":0.3725661336633709,"score_spread":0.3303280137776289,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}