{"id":"W4246228827","doi":"10.1139/f10-056","title":"Simulating spatial dynamics to evaluate methods of deriving abundance indices for tropical tunas","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Pew Charitable Trusts","keywords":"Yellowfin tuna; Stock assessment; Catch per unit effort; Akaike information criterion; Abundance (ecology); Population; Tuna; Statistics; Relative species abundance; Spatial distribution; Fishing; Fishery; Mathematics; Biology; Fish <Actinopterygii>","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003583579,0.0005077345,0.0003356138,0.0007569278,0.0004506342,0.0005987877,0.0008900677,0.0005867288,0.0009608915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0145005,0.0003551851,0.0008573238,0.0009375236,0.0004643925,0.0006787184,0.0007495004,0.0006642226,0.0001016755],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001658828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001338687,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06754293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04717835,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991677,0.0005132442,0.00006820569,0.00009851489,0.00008602476,0.00006638053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908814,0.006872782,0.0006828472,0.0007131178,0.000724496,0.0001253867],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004501756,0.00004457607,0.01530849,0.00001785947,0.00004614484,0.00001825838,0.00004859414,0.9791212,0.0002254365,0.001200697,0.00008058286,0.003843226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001768263,0.00004179,0.002433861,0.000005729881,0.00001159076,0.000009001294,0.0000417839,0.9963787,0.0004066523,0.0005383847,0.0001097719,0.000005041824],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.9677633,0.0000963288,0.02956964,0.0001081556,0.00001408863,0.00009308244,0.0006048831,0.0001608406,0.001589798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9698649,0.00007244746,0.02902474,0.00002303481,0.00000446036,0.0001170699,0.0005568984,0.00002884956,0.0003075766],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06754293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1342995,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03087412015097944,"score_gpt":0.3262677917905273,"score_spread":0.2953936716395478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}