{"id":"W4246275555","doi":"10.1139/x08-167","title":"Boreal forest provenance tests used to predict optimal growth and response to climate change: 2. Black spruce","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Tree-ring climate responses","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"Canadian Forest Service; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Northwestern University","keywords":"Black spruce; Taiga; Climate change; Environmental science; Boreal; Provenance; Range (aeronautics); Physical geography; Population; Atmospheric sciences; Ecology; Forestry; Climatology; Geography; Biology; Geology; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009800306,0.0006418744,0.0002045785,0.0002866594,0.0004249067,0.0002071389,0.0002279324,0.0001816681,0.000500441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001177675,0.0001145757,0.0003522436,0.0001882539,0.0002126632,0.0001931925,0.0001832883,0.0002296374,0.0001698437],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005310339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004304716,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02934129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09029143,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997515,0.00007762716,0.00001891229,0.00006328884,0.00006196123,0.00002667734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988318,0.000351159,0.0002724199,0.0001002464,0.000259051,0.0001852177],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001508587,0.0004632885,0.9448495,0.00003871896,0.0001735543,0.0002040999,0.0002597561,0.007183402,0.03556871,0.0001028469,0.0004709092,0.009176691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005584654,0.001040125,0.9889597,0.00000484416,0.00004242997,0.0001425798,0.00007211973,0.004123088,0.004797119,0.00005316042,0.0006963559,0.00001260175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981961,0.00003365284,0.0005989713,0.000004696848,0.000003582038,0.00002933949,0.0006464745,0.00001682765,0.0004705403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949924,0.00002783798,0.002518004,0.000009695302,0.000002334216,0.00005933363,0.001986764,0.00001103795,0.0003924851],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9706587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05834097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05287910614423264,"score_gpt":0.3091225211231692,"score_spread":0.2562434149789366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}