{"id":"W4246501592","doi":"10.22215/etd/2005-07897","title":"Comparison of three field methods for forest canopy closure modelling with Landsat imagery","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Ontario Innovation Trust","keywords":"Geography; Forestry; Closure (psychology); Canopy; Field (mathematics); Cartography; Remote sensing; Mathematics; Political science; Archaeology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00273619,0.001085623,0.0008560356,0.001642863,0.0005361614,0.001026659,0.001284862,0.0009043089,0.002331309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004386729,0.0005182259,0.0008528023,0.0008590909,0.0002265938,0.001538359,0.0005283759,0.0006341003,0.0005800229],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008383528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008672126,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03472949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03114308,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994022,0.0001683761,0.00007505726,0.0001582485,0.000146809,0.00004932624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960831,0.002444421,0.0001344569,0.0003373649,0.0009070256,0.00009360055],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001890677,0.001623545,0.01822936,0.0003899297,0.0008086132,0.00005512344,0.0003032405,0.4543523,0.006965977,0.001704586,0.003646357,0.5100303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009395911,0.0001179947,0.0050709,0.00001416413,0.00006270982,0.00001744439,0.00005415589,0.9914262,0.002205893,0.0003423512,0.0005716515,0.00002249001],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5015149,0.0009398594,0.4817151,0.0002855822,0.0002612355,0.0005509043,0.00230467,0.006531839,0.005895819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7493764,0.0003942459,0.2423608,0.0001100539,0.00006194018,0.000456133,0.003333429,0.0006094975,0.003297619],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03472949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06905466,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03319472420378526,"score_gpt":0.3598070635128466,"score_spread":0.3266123393090613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}