{"id":"W4246623778","doi":"10.26434/chemrxiv.11051315","title":"Simulating Protein-Ligand Binding with Neural Network Potentials","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ChemRxiv","topic":"Computational Drug Discovery Methods","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Molecular dynamics; Ligand (biochemistry); Intermolecular force; Binding affinities; Chemistry; Intramolecular force; Computational chemistry; Affinities; Molecule; Binding energy; Protein ligand; Conformational isomerism; Bound state; Stereochemistry; Physics; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008276762,0.0004243934,0.0005184311,0.0001254982,0.0001636072,0.0007462481,0.001464801,0.0002034482,0.000008858366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001125229,0.0003795195,0.0001734797,0.0004450406,0.00005498036,0.0003986494,0.002472294,0.0007154979,0.0000520697],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009720947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000332123,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001529397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001571385,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971341,0.0002091556,0.0004369209,0.001078715,0.0005994302,0.0005416074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977078,0.0003899239,0.0004824894,0.001115842,0.0001848498,0.0001190943],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001152344,0.00002132593,0.0004545996,0.0001533743,0.00006168481,0.00002459942,0.0001345742,0.9934114,0.0008971119,0.00181466,0.0001239677,0.002891149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003250668,0.00004122618,0.001060895,0.000538079,0.00002338302,0.00001455657,0.000006555785,0.9818742,0.005436606,0.00991215,0.0001935854,0.0005737289],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5061837,0.0001264364,0.4909348,0.0003342729,0.0008095713,0.0006534188,0.000001081106,0.0001957247,0.0007610119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8282644,0.000001621696,0.1706658,0.0001352082,0.0004962405,0.00004932093,0.00002183195,0.00004102904,0.0003245191],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3220807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998657,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03473603821515549,"score_gpt":0.2976499208463991,"score_spread":0.2629138826312437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}