{"id":"W4247164742","doi":"10.7287/peerj.preprints.27355v1","title":"Preferences and constraints: The value of economic games for studying human sociality","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Culture, Economy, and Development Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sociality; Observational study; Value (mathematics); Measure (data warehouse); Presentation (obstetrics); Economic model; Subject (documents); Economics; Psychology; Positive economics; Social psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Microeconomics; Ecology; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01356278,0.001139841,0.001574054,0.001591385,0.001473578,0.004977199,0.00230934,0.001944562,0.002806748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04598292,0.0007254778,0.00134428,0.001407268,0.01691069,0.01366153,0.004184302,0.007195783,0.0002603743],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00225665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001315581,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003501403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002344758,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9917659,0.006643986,0.0002290187,0.0005451251,0.0006025638,0.0002134167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9570464,0.03519195,0.002106135,0.00338089,0.0009897134,0.001284927],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001747344,0.00002845005,0.001261126,0.00007407099,0.00004108213,0.00003935292,0.0005972904,0.006822933,0.00007419797,0.9849022,0.0005612796,0.005580613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009007066,0.00001264235,0.000371625,0.00003051861,0.000007120815,0.00001896119,0.0001561943,0.01138329,0.00002900264,0.9859934,0.001976641,0.00001164732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0878947,0.006398289,0.7924278,0.04712671,0.0007603574,0.0002374185,0.0003680574,0.00007696074,0.06470977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8454688,0.003356843,0.1434594,0.00308691,0.0007700712,0.0006995188,0.0001037263,0.00006939483,0.002985339],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01356278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07172769,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1413689718147282,"score_gpt":0.3857447870827753,"score_spread":0.2443758152680471,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}