{"id":"W4247258701","doi":"10.4095/225846","title":"Residual total magnetic field, Burntbush area aeromagnetic survey, NTS 42 H/08 (south-east), Ontario","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Aeromagnetic survey; Geology; Residual; Seismology; Geodesy; Magnetic field; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003626117,0.0004733157,0.0003967945,0.002369413,0.002897245,0.000761562,0.001013648,0.0002757524,0.01384482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001224805,0.0003752568,0.0002163043,0.00353289,0.0004536138,0.0004546079,0.0004541053,0.0005003914,0.004130465],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01296578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0261938,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9910115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970871,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999428,0.00002661406,0.00002430292,0.0000770666,0.0003423561,0.000101577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978607,0.00006628636,0.0001213437,0.00008277037,0.001633032,0.0002358633],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007896717,0.0002579681,0.6190629,0.0005004717,0.0001184379,0.0006519867,0.003653218,0.002692609,0.007016761,0.001601665,0.292124,0.07153032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009806015,0.00005256466,0.8887905,0.00005993611,0.00004086126,0.00008293868,0.001768311,0.001210896,0.001606748,0.0001059381,0.1061593,0.00002385959],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4024584,0.0007841996,0.001980542,0.001103918,0.0001582684,0.0007999587,0.448849,0.0006333129,0.1432324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4778621,0.001135538,0.004672039,0.0002489615,0.00008499449,0.0004142046,0.1760804,0.0003063994,0.3391954],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01384482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09407371,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04578038022476857,"score_gpt":0.2321992641576885,"score_spread":0.1864188839329199,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}