{"id":"W4247270973","doi":"10.31236/osf.io/86t72","title":"Consensus meetings and statements are flawed by design: A narrative review with suggestions for improvements","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Jewish General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Statement (logic); Transparency (behavior); Interpretation (philosophy); Observational study; Unanimity; Plain language; Psychology; Rigour; Political science; Scientific consensus; Consistency (knowledge bases); Dissenting opinion; Public relations; Narrative; Medicine; Law; Computer science; Epistemology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6449407,0.004539503,0.009469754,0.01787416,0.006813292,0.02489388,0.01130714,0.02079454,0.01057087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8141105,0.00590689,0.01318952,0.014303,0.02441355,0.06449265,0.01475737,0.02156501,0.004976427],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06503242,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005570583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008576293,"domain_scores_codex":[0.2626875,0.5575245,0.1087745,0.01614947,0.05177767,0.003086281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1229724,0.670469,0.07257919,0.03189107,0.09909915,0.002989083],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001317926,0.0001520349,0.002252299,0.2472812,0.005663326,0.0009734964,0.02701272,0.001527071,0.0008135185,0.1893709,0.2188785,0.3047571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001172059,0.000392262,0.001105955,0.4875896,0.003877853,0.001257502,0.01097154,0.002336634,0.0009094758,0.2021829,0.2875013,0.0007028776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.001378953,0.2652167,0.07220339,0.5945036,0.05172341,0.01039026,0.0006128815,0.0005401601,0.003430693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06415584,0.2425462,0.3667144,0.2297207,0.02773151,0.06349248,0.0009608857,0.0004841403,0.004193821],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3550593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4378514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7287972722920395,"score_gpt":0.5779587331135492,"score_spread":0.1508385391784903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}