{"id":"W4247547787","doi":"10.1139/cgj-37-1-272","title":"Evaluating cyclic liquefaction potential using the cone penetration test: Reply","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cone penetration test; Geotechnical engineering; Penetration test; Liquefaction; Soil liquefaction; Geology; Penetration (warfare); Standard penetration test; Forensic engineering; Engineering; Subgrade; Operations research","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004160813,0.0009340985,0.001090211,0.0009922188,0.001427569,0.001732483,0.003307062,0.02485506,0.003568708],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02861943,0.000718836,0.001251183,0.001166547,0.002483886,0.002980917,0.001195268,0.02195895,0.003648078],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002964071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00364214,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02837355,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02221102,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973676,0.0004253793,0.0007100927,0.0004619278,0.0008205674,0.0002145254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975772,0.008957738,0.0007736497,0.0004933457,0.01304791,0.0009554565],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000248989,0.0001589774,0.00662915,0.0005158021,0.00008113123,0.001846658,0.0006391127,0.0004837164,0.002248245,0.002325931,0.9410886,0.04373371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002143374,0.0004221071,0.01710885,0.0007263708,0.0003167388,0.004109623,0.004349669,0.001302919,0.005301499,0.01039388,0.955364,0.0003900967],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.002459191,0.00395352,0.001191982,0.9644435,0.02594887,0.00005243647,0.0004130008,0.0000789283,0.001458534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02520026,0.007576241,0.002738623,0.918627,0.03425261,0.0001608146,0.0002349947,0.00006647251,0.01114305],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02837355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05641675,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01667456217307646,"score_gpt":0.2486389586491481,"score_spread":0.2319643964760717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}